John Mann is a Corbyn critic – but like Corbyn he opposes air strikes in Syria

John Mann.

John Mann.

He couldn’t resist having a crack at his leader – saying he was setting out his position on air strikes before the shadow cabinet came to a decision as he was not willing to be whipped on it – but John Mann still said he would vote the same way: Against.

And he’s to be praised for it.

How many Labour MPs are preparing to vote with David Cameron, simply to snub a leader whose politics they dislike? If This Writer’s sources are to be believed, only a handful – and some of them may reconsider in the knowledge that Mr Mann has made a decision to vote alongside the Labour leader – because he believes it is right.

Here’s the conclusion to the reasoned explanation of his position:

I have no problem with the ethics or morality of the UK being involved in military action to remove ISIS. They are a terrorist force that will continue their attempts to murder and enslave everyone who refuses to bow to their ideology and continue to attack the West.

However the proposal from David Cameron will fail.

A few extra planes attacking defined targets in Syria are neither a solution, nor are they much assistance. This approach is more of a gesture. Syria needs more than gestures.

What is needed is a UN mandate for unified military action, led by Arab nations, with the Russians and others. We should play our part in winning such a mandate and in then delivering it.

There should be an immediate ceasefire as part of this mandate for all of the non-ISIS controlled area of Syria – which means for most of the country including all of that controlled by the Syrian government. Obviously a long term peace plan and settlement must be negotiated using the security of a UN ceasefire.

That mandate should include the creation of safe zones, including a long term security for the Kurds and Yazidis and should also initiate a plan for the resettlement of the millions of Syrian refugees.

There are many other elements needed to curtail Islamic terrorism worldwide, but Cameron’s proposal does nothing whatsoever on them and makes such initiatives more unlikely.

I will therefore be voting against the Government’s current proposals.

Source: Vote on the RAF taking part in air strikes against ISIS in Syria

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

2 Comments

  1. maxwell1957 December 1, 2015 at 6:08 pm - Reply

    If the proposed action is ratified the only beneficiaries from such action will be the company that manufacture the ” Brimstone ” weapon system because they will probably see sales increase.

  2. Patricia Sheerin December 1, 2015 at 10:36 pm - Reply

    A very nasty man. I wrote to him asking him not to brief against Corbyn to the media and he sent me a very rude reply saying I was “talking rubbish”. Very unprofessional.

Leave A Comment