The Richmond Park by-election, the upset – and the spin

Sarah Olney smiles after winning the Richmond Park by-election [Image: PA].

Sarah Olney smiles after winning the Richmond Park by-election [Image: PA].

Congratulations to Liberal Democrat Sarah Olney on her narrow win against Zac Goldsmith. It shows that if you flood a constituency with supporters and pester the public hard enough, there’s nothing you can’t get them to do.

Of course, it isn’t very pleasant – but then, Liberal Democrats aren’t.

Party supporters flooded into Richmond Park, making nearly 100,000 attempts to speak to the constituency’s 82,500 voters, and stuffing their letterboxes with pamphlets.

Many constituents said they had been annoyed by the bombardment of Lib Dem propaganda.

The Liberal Democrats had two advantages in any case: Firstly, Richmond Park had been a Lib Dem seat until 2010, so voters had a natural inclination in their direction. And the constituency had voted Remain in the EU referendum, with 72 per cent of voters opposing Brexit.

Party campaigning was therefore focused on a promise to oppose Tory plans to quit the EU, with Ms Olney vowing to vote against any move to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty that might be put through Parliament.

Where does that leave Labour?

Many commentators will want to assure you that this is evidence of Labour’s disappearance from the political mainstream. You’ll see it in all the newspapers that are run by right-wing businessmen who want you to vote in their best interests.

Tim Farron, leader of the Liberal Democrats, came up with this scurrilous nonsense in his comments to the BBC: “Clearly a concern to voters was they desperately wanted a moderate, decent alternative to the Tories now Labour has shuffled off the main stage.”

Again, this is a comment from a man with a vested – indeed, desperate, considering the Liberal Democrats now have a grand total of nine MPs – interest in talking down the Labour Party.

Hopefully his comments will come as a sharp reminder to those within Labour who said that party should not field a candidate, that it had a duty to do so – and that failing to do so would have worsened the criticism from opponents like the schoolboyish Farron.

Clive Lewis, Lisa Nandy and Jonathan Reynolds had argued that Labour had little chance of winning in Richmond Park and should not field a candidate, but This Writer agrees with Peter Edwards of LabourList.

He wrote: “Avoiding the fight entirely would have resonated around the country. Labour needs to show people who struggle under the oppressive and unjust weight of a Tory government that it is fighting for them, even when its chances of success are slim to minuscule.”

Quite correct. Labour’s position on Brexit – that the EU referendum is done, the people have spoken, and we have to get the best out of it that we can – was never going to be popular in Richmond.

But Labour had to be there to show that the party opposes – in all parts of the UK – the dangerous right-wing policies of Zac Goldsmith and, until the dissolution of the Tory-Lib Dem coalition, Tim Farron; policies that led to the death of a man in freezing Birmingham earlier this week.

And after Mr Goldsmith’s disgustingly racist campaign to be London Mayor, how would it have looked if Labour had not fielded a candidate against him? The party would have been accused of backing away from the fight or – worse – condoning the racism employed by the Goldsmith campaign.

This is a tricky time for Labour.

The party has a hugely popular leader who has, at long last, put forward policies that a majority of the public support.

The Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, UKIP, the SNP and most of the people you’ll see on the BBC’s Question Time are terrified of this.

So their strategy is to starve Labour of the oxygen of publicity by putting forward warped claims about the party and denying it the chance to respond.

Notice, for example, that there is no comment from a Labour representative in the BBC’s article, quoted below.

That is not an accident.

So beware.

These so-called Liberals and Tories and their allies in the media will spin you into voting for another extreme right-wing government if they possibly can.

The Liberal Democrats have caused a major upset in the Richmond Park by-election, overturning a 23,015 majority to oust ex-Tory MP Zac Goldsmith.

Mr Goldsmith stood as an independent after leaving the Conservative Party in protest at the government’s decision to back a third Heathrow runway.

But Lib Dem Sarah Olney, who is also opposed to Heathrow expansion, fought the campaign on the issue of Brexit.

Labour’s Christian Wolmar lost his £500 deposit as he trailed a distant third.

Ms Olney polled 20,510 votes to Mr Goldsmith’s 18,638.

The Conservative Party, UK Independence Party and Green Party did not field candidates.

Source: Zac Goldsmith ousted by Lib Dems in Richmond Park by-election – BBC News

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


8 thoughts on “The Richmond Park by-election, the upset – and the spin

  1. tom

    As always, Lib/Dem uses the crumbs left by other parties to claim a landslide victory.
    We heard the new leader of UKIP declaring is the party for the working class and the second party behind tories ( yes, in his dreams with 9000 voters)
    The leader of Lib/Dem declaring his party is back with winning Rishmond Park.
    These are the politiciens of the 21rst century, it shows how the financial system, the bankers have stolen our democracy.
    These bunch of dreamers think they can trigger another referendum when all the cards are on the table, the parliament had past the saying to the people, it is the people who are representing the sovereignty of the country and the people have spoken on the 23rd Juin 2016, this referendum has put the british people in the history books, soon the Lib/Dem will see how the EU is coming to an end starting by this week end with Austria and Italy, following next May by France which already the actual president has given up for a second term because he finally knows how much he is disliked with 4% of the population with him, Germany’s election in September with Merkel not sure to be reelected, the next year is looking very interesting.

  2. tom

    Mike, no, you did not understand me, people are waking up and they want their democracy back, their sovereignty back, and not every one who is against this left ie New Labour, or Socialist like Hollande is not automatically fascist, we can have different vues than you and not been labelled fascist.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      I understood you well enough, I think. Who do you hope will win in the European elections, then?

  3. tom

    Mike, you still don’t understand, it doesn’t matter to me who won it does matter to the people of the country. There is a big difference here between us. So far the right or the left, people want to get rid of the neo conservative and the neo liberals, people want another Europe that’s why i am for the dissmiss of this Europe to give a chance for the future generation to built an Europe for the Europeens and not for an elite specially Americain.If i take Hollande in France there are many, many reasons for his popularity tumbled to 4%. The french people voted NO to the treaty of Lisbon, they were not listened, the Irish kept voting until the elite was satisfied.Next year is very interesting because we may witness big changes because the people are waking up due to internet and alternative sources of good and reel informations, people are realising that they have been duped for centuries, this planet produce enough for everyone to live decently.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      And you think that justifies ignorance to the rise of the extreme right-wing politics that is capitalising on the unrest you mention?
      You need to understand what is happening.
      This is not a movement towards popular representation – it is a movement towards extremist ideology of the kind that will crush popular democracy if it gets the chance.

Comments are closed.