Latest Grenfell revelations are shocking – especially relating to George Osborne

[Image from Political Scrapbook.]

The headline news here is that George Osborne, as the newly-appointed editor of the Evening Standard, ordered the paper’s reporters not to take a hard line when reporting the fire at Grenfell Tower in Kensington.

It seems he was worried that the budget cuts he imposed as Chancellor of the Exchequer might be linked to the deaths of mostly-poor Londoners.

So his line was to call on people to show “unity in grief” and to raise funds for victims, according to a profile of him in Esquire magazine, reported in Political Scrapbook.

As a professional news reporter, This Writer finds his behaviour utterly unacceptable if this is true. It is the news reporter’s job to be impartial; to report the facts as they are known.

That is what Osborne himself said he would do when he took over as the Standard‘s editor:

Instead it seems he has been doing himself just as many favours as he could.

Incidentally, the line taken by Osborne and the Standard – that everybody should express their unity and not go anywhere near discussing the causes of the fire – was adopted by many right-wing reporters, commentators and members of the public, who then tried to shame the rest of us for bothering to point out that there were political reasons for the disaster.

I think I’m still correct in saying This Site was the first to make these connections. It would be nice to see those who criticised me for doing so admit that it was their vitriol that was inappropriate – but I shan’t hold my breath waiting for it.

In other news, fire chiefs have called for sprinklers to be retrofitted into tower blocks in response to the Grenfell disaster:

In fact, residents had been campaigning for sprinklers to be fitted for years before the fire happened. But London fire commissioner Dany Cotton is absolutely right to use the disaster to press for action now.

The BBC has revealed that a series of tower block blazes in at least the last eight years meant it was known in the construction industry that polyethylene cladding panels were unsafe – so why were they still used on Grenfell Tower after this became common knowledge? Here’s the report:

The report also suggested that, knowing the risks, someone made a decision to swap non-combustible cladding for cheaper – but flammable – cladding instead, in order to save just £60,000:

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:



  1. NMac September 14, 2017 at 7:51 am - Reply

    The cover up has begun.

  2. Barry Davies September 14, 2017 at 8:32 am - Reply

    I don’t have a problem with any media outlet not making assumptions on the cause of the fire, although the cladding, and lack of sprinklers, no doubt added to the problem, because as yet the investigation has not uncovered the initial event. On the other hand I do want to know why the massive amount of monies raised to help the residents of Grenfell tTower is being held by a company which seems to not want to distribute it to those in dire need.

  3. Dan Delion September 14, 2017 at 1:45 pm - Reply

    Criticism of the Authorities’ tardy and half-hearted response to the Grenfell major emergency is bolstered by the Government’s inadequate response to the damage inflicted by Irma on UK West Indian territories. The Civil Contingencies Act, revised by the Tories 2011 – 2013 clearly requires those first Responders with a duty of care to prepare their humanitarian response in advance of foreseeable disasters.
    Major fire in places of collective residence is one (standared) emergency that requires prior constructive emergency planning, as does the forecast of imminent major hurricane damage.

    In both cases our Tory Government has signally failed to deliver an adequate response even, in the case of Irma, with a week’s warning of the biggest C5 hurricane for decades. Their interpretation of “emergency planning” seems to be to wait until the emergency is upon us before any planning is carried out! (Now, where’s the fag packet?)

    If the French and Dutch ensured that water, food and shelter were on their way within a day, then so could the UK. Is this an indication of our Government’s post-Brexit attitude to those of us in need ? Going by numerous recent actions it’s hard to avoid an affirmative answer!

Leave A Comment