Will they every be answered?
This Writer doubts it.
But we will never be able to trust a Tory government until they are.
1. Did he abuse his power?
The original allegation by academic and writer Kate Maltby was that before he was a minister Green, who was a family friend, touched her knee, said his wife was “very understanding”, and gave her to understand that her career as a Tory activist could be advanced by an affair with a sleazy bald man 30 years her senior.
Beyond saying she was “plausible” her claims have not been studied. As a result, the voters of Ashford in Kent, his colleagues in government, and his friend Theresa still don’t know if he was in the habit of using his position as a MP to satisfy personal lust, and to do so by pressurising or dangling preferment before women who might otherwise have told him to sod off.
2. Did he try to destroy Kate Maltby?
In the wake of her allegations the Daily Mail published not one but two unfavourable opinion pieces about Kate.
It quoted an unnamed friend saying her parents “will be absolutely aghast by what Kate has done. They are good and decent people who eschew publicity. They are still friends with Damian and his wife. I’m tempted to say what was she thinking about. But we know that. She was thinking about Kate Maltby.”
Her parents said: “We are not surprised to find that the inquiry found Mr Green to have been untruthful as a minister, nor to that they found our daughter to be a plausible witness… despite the attempted campaign in certain sections of the media to denigrate and intimidate her and other witnesses. We are proud of her.”
So who was the unnamed friend? Was it Green, one of his associates, or a member of his staff? Journalists should always protect their sources, but not when it turns out the source has lied in what looks like an attempt to destroy the reputation of a “plausible” woman.
If Green was not involved in an ugly public campaign to wreck the credibility of a self-employed woman who had annoyed him, he has a right to be cleared of any suspicion. And if he or any of his friends were, we have a right to know.
3. What did Theresa May know, and when?
Theresa May has been mates with Damian Green for her entire adult life. When the allegations emerged she ordered a whitewash – that Kate’s claims shouldn’t be examined closely, but instead whether he’d broken the rules of behaviour since.
Did he discuss it with her? Did he lie to her?
During the inquiry she didn’t suspend him, or move him out of harm’s way – she allowed him to sit in for her at Prime Minister’s Questions, to chair cabinet committees, to remain at the top table.
If she did that knowing he had made false statements about what he knew of pornography on his computer her position is untenable. Perhaps someone else in Downing Street knew, and kept it from her – in which case we need to know when they’re going to be sacked, too.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at https://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: