After Keir Starmer’s speech, people turn to the Green Party

Last Updated: January 4, 2024By Tags: , , , , , ,

Keir Starmer: Labour’s poll lead over the Tories may have dropped after his speech.

Keir Starmer gave his big New Year speech, and it landed like a lump of lead.

As This Site reported on January 2, Starmer was appealing for disillusioned stay-at-home voters to turn out for the next general election, warning that apathy could keep the Tories in power.

This Writer knew it was going to be bad when I saw this post on ‘X’:

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

Nobody with any influence was going to take it seriously, then – and how could they, when the Labour leader who has been lying to the nation since before he was elected to that post in 2020 bemoaned the fact that people don’t trust politicians any more?

There was a bit of guff about offering “fundamental change”, but how fundamental was it, really?

If all he has to offer are warmed-over Tory policies, then he has nothing to offer at all – and even the media representatives at the event picked up on this:

We’ll come back to the Green Party momentarily, but let’s examine a couple more elements that put the seal on Starmer’s shame. First, his failure to act properly with regard to Peter Mandelson’s relationship with paedophiliacs’ pimp Jeffrey Epstein:

As soon as Mandelson’s alleged connection with Epstein became known to him – which may have been before it was public knowledge – Starmer should have acted to find out the facts, and done whatever was necessary to safeguard the reputation of Labour. He didn’t.

It is now years since we discovered the Tory whips had a file covering the illegal activities – many of them sexual – of a large number of that party’s MPs. Is it realistic to believe that Labour does not have a similar dossier? And if Labour doesn’t, isn’t this a failure on Starmer’s part? He should be ensuring that nobody represents his party who isn’t as pure as the driven snow.

Secondly – and not mentioned at the event – is the inherent hypocrisy of Starmer’s message, appealing for voters who may have turned away from Labour to come back and support him. It suggests a selective amnesia – forgetting that he is the Labour leader who pushed so many of them away:

Yes, people have found another party to support. Which party?

That’s right – the Green Party is the preference for disillusioned former Labour members and supporters – and deputy leader Zack Polanski was quick to capitalise on that:

I have seen – and responded to – some arguments that the Greens don’t have enough support, from silly, silly people:

The argument supports the status quo that merely passes power between two sets of politicians that are equally corrupt, allowing them to divide the prosperity provided by the world’s sixth largest economy between them while leaving nothing for the rest of us.

And it puts far too much influence in the hands of the polling companies, who are mostly run by people who support right-wing politics. What makes you think they will ever admit what the majority of people in the UK really want?

Starmer reckons it doesn’t matter what he says or how he is criticised, because voters don’t have an alternative – and supporters like “Jank”, above, seem keen to prove him right.

How about we all spend this year proving both of them wrong?


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

11 Comments

  1. graham poulloin January 4, 2024 at 5:28 pm - Reply

    McSweeney’s Starmer and Reeves won’t be any difference to the IEA’s Sunak and Hunt. They might slow Britain’s decline a little, but McSweeny Starmer and Reeves will bring the end of the Labour party. At a time Britain really needs a Labour party

  2. Gary Bowman January 4, 2024 at 5:54 pm - Reply

    The one thing that it is impossible to deny, his father was definitely a toolmaker!

  3. oeggame1 January 4, 2024 at 7:06 pm - Reply

    Will not b voting for the cuckoo in the nest but would vote for my local MP who stammer took the whip away from

  4. Fauziah Court January 4, 2024 at 7:55 pm - Reply

    I left the Labour party for good nearly 2 years ago and joined the Green party, whether they wii make any difference remains to be seen.

  5. James January 4, 2024 at 8:51 pm - Reply

    Problem: the ‘Greens’ (as a political party – there are a number of individual exceptions, but they’re getting suspended or kicked out) are both seriously ‘woke’ AND they’re full on for war with Russia. So no to the ‘Greens’; they’re just as crap as the Tories and ‘Labour’. And please don’t mention the LimpDems… As Fraser said so often and so memorably in ‘Dads Army’, “We’re DOOMED!” (with a Scottish accent)

    • Mike Sivier January 5, 2024 at 7:45 pm - Reply

      What’s wrong with being “woke”? It just means a person is politically aware and knows what’s actually going on around them.
      The Greens are NOT “full on for war with Russia” – as far as I can tell. Please explain where you found any such information so the rest of us can check it out.
      I do tend to agree with you about the Liberal Democrats, though. Who would trust them after the Coalition government of 2010-15?

      • James January 6, 2024 at 10:37 pm - Reply

        ‘What’s wrong with being “woke”? It just means a person is politically aware and knows what’s actually going on around them.’
        Come off it, Mike! You must know as well as I do that the term “woke” means adhering rigidly and unthinkingly to the current trending mindset among the easily brainwashed who THINK they’re leftish.

        • Mike Sivier January 7, 2024 at 2:20 pm - Reply

          That would be the right-wing interpretation of the term that has been laid over it.

          The dictionary definition (data from Oxford Languages) is: “alert to injustice and discrimination in society, especially racism”.

  6. Martin Odoni January 5, 2024 at 9:17 am - Reply

    Jank’s argument is the vintage self-fulfilling prophecy.

  7. James January 6, 2024 at 10:30 pm - Reply

    In reply to @0xJANK’s tweet “Theories are great until they’re put into practice”: That’s what is commonly known as a cop out. Not that I trust today’s warmongering ‘woke’ alleged ‘Greens’ any more than the Tories, ‘Labour’ (always in quotes these days) or the LimpDems… EVERYONE should deliberately spoil their ballot >>> ‘winner’ has NO SUPPORT. And I see that the aforementioned warmongering ‘woke’ alleged ‘Greens’ are suspending or kicking out anyone who doesn’t stick rigidly to the current party line on wokeness. Not a good look.

    • Mike Sivier January 7, 2024 at 2:21 pm - Reply

      Citation needed. Where’s the evidence of what the Greens are doing?

Leave A Comment