Labour MP’s Syria demand was a damp squib rather than a bombshell

Jo Cox MP.

Jo Cox MP.

A Labour MP who defied her party’s leadership and linked up with Tory bobby-slanderer Andrew Mitchell to demand military, humanitarian and diplomatic action in Syria has been rebuffed by the Conservative Government.

This Writer is now awaiting renewed – ridiculous – SNP claims that Labour is “in bed with the Tories”.

Jo Cox’s argument was well-attended, despite the fact that it was an adjournment debate held after 10pm yesterday. But there was no vote and her arguments were rebuffed by Tobias Ellwood, under-secretary of state for foreign and Commonwealth affairs. Here are the highlights:

“Will we step up to play our part in stopping the abject horror of the Syrian civil war and the spread of the modern-day fascism of ISIS, or will we step to one side, say that it is too complicated, and leave Iran, Russia, Assad and ISIS to turn the country into a graveyard? Whatever we decide will stay with us for ever, and I ask that each of us take that responsibility personally,” said Ms Cox.

“My heart sank as I watched in 2013 when, following President Assad’s use of chemical weapons against civilians, we first voted against a military response and then supported taking military options off the table.

“Our failure to intervene to protect civilians left Assad at liberty to escalate both the scale and the ferocity of his attacks on innocent Syrians in a desperate attempt to cling to power.

“Syria is not Iraq. I opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning because I believed that the risk to civilian lives was too high, and their protection was never the central objective.

“We can, and must, address both Assad and ISIS for two principal reasons. First, a sole focus on ISIS will not end the conflict and the threats to our interests. The Assad regime ignited, and continues to drive, the violence in Syria. This year alone, it has killed seven times more civilians than ISIS, so a strategy that only focuses on ISIS will not end the fighting or the threat to regional stability. It will not stem the tide of desperate refugees pouring into Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan, or trying to get into Europe.

“The UK’s response to the refugee crisis, which has, to date, been woefully inadequate. Taking 20,000 refugees over five years is simply not good enough; it sends an awful message about how seriously we take civilian protection. Whether it is the response to the drownings in the Mediterranean or our offer to take Syrian refugees, the Prime Minister has been pushed into climbdown after climbdown, embarrassed into action by the humanity of the British public. It is time for him to lead, not follow.

“A no-fly zone would be an enormous military undertaking, and would entail significant risks, particularly now that Russia has joined the regime in the Syrian skies.

“I agree that we should try to secure a UN Security Council resolution, but I do not think we should limit ourselves to not acting without one. I believe a no-bombing zone is feasible if it is enforced from maritime assets in the Mediterranean, so as to avoid engaging Syrian air defences.”

Mr Ellwood responded: “Unless we have a UN resolution, it is very hard to march forward. I am afraid that, on more than one occasion, either China or Russia has vetoed attempts to move this situation forward. I also disagree with her about the choice between ISIS or Assad. We have never made that statement—quite the opposite, in fact.

“This is a crisis caused and fuelled by the Assad regime, which is responsible for the vast majority of deaths. Almost 90% of the civilian deaths are a result of the regime’s indiscriminate bombing, its shelling of urban areas, its siege tactics and its use of chemical and toxic substances. This instability has fuelled a migration crisis that affects neighbouring countries, the wider region and Europe as well.

“Assad’s failure to recognise the Sunni people, who make up two thirds of the country’s population, has acted as a recruiting sergeant for ISIL. Today, ISIL poses a threat not just to the region but wider afield to the UK as well.

“The ultimate solution both to the migration crisis and the threats emanating from Syria is a political transition that involves a mechanism for Assad to step down. It is for the Syrian people to decide exactly how that happens.

“The UK supports the efforts of the UN envoy, Staffan de Mistura, who faces a complex and challenging task. The UN Security Council and the wider international community must support Mr de Mistura’s efforts as he works with the Syrian parties to deliver a political process that brings about an inclusive transition.

“We call on Russia to cease its attacks on the Syrian opposition and civilians and to focus its efforts on ISIL.

“There has been talk of safe or protected zones, no-fly zones and so on, but history tells us that implementing genuinely safe zones is difficult and must be accompanied by an international mandate that would provide the will, the authority and the full means to ensure that they have a chance of being effective. It would also involve significant military commitment. As we have seen, that can be hard to come by from the various Parliaments across the world.”

It seems clear that the predictions of mainstream media outlets like the Graun, which stated, “it would be a huge blow to the leader’s authority if a vote was passed with the backing of a sizable number of Labour MPs,” were overexaggerated, to say the least.

Perhaps the saddest aspect of this is that Ms Cox’s legitimate anger – against the Conservative Government’s failure to act appropriately in response to the situation in Syria – was neutralised by its association with the elements of her speech that the minister could answer.

So – a damp squib rather than the bombshell against Jeremy Corbyn that some of us were led to expect.

No doubt the media (and other political parties) will continue their attempts to pressurise the Labour leadership, but on this evidence it seems Jeremy Corbyn has little to fear.

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


5 thoughts on “Labour MP’s Syria demand was a damp squib rather than a bombshell

  1. John.

    Poor woman, utterly clueless, she’s in good company though.

    These people haven’t a clue what they’re talking about, beyond the mainstream propaganda induced psychosis that afflicts them. The ISIS deception. Which explains in part why the M.E. is such a damned mess.

    Perhaps if the ongoing CIA meddling and covert funding being funnelled to extremist terror groups in Syria were stopped, things might stabilise. Fat chance, the malignant US foriegn policy directed from Tel Aviv by Zionist quislings in Washington isn’t going to start breaking a multi decade M.O. in support of the delinquent supremacist colony just because a few hundred thousand Arabs are being slaughtered in the ongoing Yinon Plan to totally destabilise and balkanise the region.

    Then again with the UK nasties and barbaric Saudis making not so secret pacts to secure their places on the UNHRC, it’s clear that once again real solutions are of no importance, just the presevation of a seat on the gravy train, snouts in the trough, dirty business as usual, greed and power are all that matter in a world run by self serving psychopaths.

  2. mohandeer

    Yesterday I sent emails to the three idiots advocating further bombing of Syria. I explained that the UN had presented a report to Obama that the chemical weapons attack by two unguided home-made devices were not the work of Assad, which the report stipulates twice on pages 11 and 28. It also stated that the attacks which the US administration used as an example of Assad’s “supposed” brutality, were in fact the product of enemies of the Assad regime. Al Qaeda backed by Saudi with weapons made available to them through Turkey have been named as the likely culprits and they are sponsored by the US. If this silly creature had half a brain she might be useful, sadly that is not the case – but hey – what are soundbites for? (brainless bimbos in this particular instance)

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      I don’t think Jo Cox is brainless or a bimbo.
      I think she was mistaken to act as she has, but calling her derogatory names won’t help.

  3. mohandeer

    So in your world, a Labour MP misrepresenting Assad and his regimes is OK she’s just an utterly clueless poor woman, on the gravy train with her snout in the trough, greedy and power mad and what was it John said? Oh, a self serving psychopath. Better? Of course it is, she’s not a Tory, who would know the difference unless she was wearing a label. I really don’t care what double standards people adopt or how bigoted they are, as long as they don’t try and pull the wool over my eyes. You don’t agree with my views, you want to slap me down? Now I understand the rules, we’ll be just fine and dandy.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      Don’t try to tell anybody here what they think.
      If you don’t like it when other people pass comment on your opinions, that’s your concern and nobody else’s.

Comments are closed.