BBC hides important evidence to present rosy picture of ‘hard’ Brexit


This is why politics needs the social media – you can’t trust the mainstream news sources to provide balanced coverage any more.

They attack sites like Pride’s Purge, claiming they are produced by people who are “not proper reporters”, and then published biased material like this.

And then they claim – with ever-more improbably vehemence – to be impartial!

It’s all just further proof that This Writer – and I am a “proper reporter”, by the way – was lucky not to have been employed by BBC Online back in the 1990s.

I work in the social media, where high-quality news reporting remains the norm, not the exception.

What’s happening with the BBC?

They seem to have come over all right-wing tabloidy.

A bizarre report by the BBC today claims the UK economy will be given a £135bn annual boost’ by a hard Brexit.

In its article, the BBC extensively quotes infamous Thatcherite economist Patrick Minford, who is the lead author of a report urging the hardest of hard Brexits from pro-Brexit campaign group Economists for Free Trade.

[But the BBC has been] completely censoring failing to mention any of the extremely negative consequences of the group’s proposals, as predicted by Professor Minford himself.

Namely, for example, that the hard Brexit proposed by the group will eliminate UK manufacturing.

And the BBC report also completely omits the fact that Professor Minford is happy to see the UK car industry “run down” after a hard Brexit.

Or that – according to Minford – there will be large increases in wage inequality after a hard Brexit. Or to put it another way, poorer workers will be paid less.

Minford’s methodologies have also been widely debunked – something else the BBC fail to mention.

Why doesn’t the BBC report the stated negative affects of a hard-Brexit, as stated by hard-Brexiters themselves?

Source: BBC censors quotes: UK manufacturing “eliminated” and car production “run down” after hard-Brexit | Pride’s Purge


Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

7 thoughts on “BBC hides important evidence to present rosy picture of ‘hard’ Brexit

  1. Neilth

    Milford was the one who wanted to remove benefits etc from the ‘underclass’ his neologism which encouraged some of the worst excesses of Thatchers attacks on the unions and the poor. He was vehemently anti Europe back then and has become no less irrational in his ‘Europe Bad US Good’ mantra.
    You are right Mike he is totally discredited in most analyses and it is a shame that Cardiff Uni continues to offer him a base to spout his Thatcherite Fundamentalism

  2. V Bayliss

    I suggest readers look at the BBC item and reach their own conclusions. They have reported what Minford has said and also quoted economists with opposing views. What they’re supposed to do, really? And before anyone trolls me, let me say I regard the BBC as always having trimmed a good way to the right, and I don’t like that one bit.It doesn’t however help to present things so poorly.

  3. Zippi

    It is virtually impossible to find unbiased reporting in the mainstream media; everybody seems to have an agenda. Whatever happened to reporting the facts, rather then interpreting them? There has been far too much of that, to the extent that we probably wouldn’t recognise the truth, if it came up to us with a passport, which said “the truth!” yet, people still believe all that they read.

Comments are closed.