Mainstream media make fools of themselves by following fake news ‘racism’ story about Emma Dent Coad

Emma Dent Coad.

What the blazes is wrong with these people?

Today the BBC, The Independent, the Evening Standard, iNews, and no doubt others all got on the Guido Fawkes fake news bandwagon to pillory a totally innocent Labour MP on a trumped-up charge of racism.

What’s strangest about this case is the fact that they would know better, if they had bothered to read the article used by the Guido Fawkes “reporter” as a source.

An unnamed BBC reporter writes: “In the piece Ms Dent Coad claimed Mr [Shaun] Bailey, who was a parliamentary candidate for Hammersmith, had “stigmatised” the area he was born in by referring to it as a “ghetto”.

“”Who can say where this man will ever fit in, however hard he tries? One day he is the ‘token ghetto boy’ standing behind D Cameron, the next ‘looking interested’ beside G Osborne. Ever felt used?”, she wrote.

“After the blog post was highlighted, Mr Bailey said he had never been “labelled a ‘token ghetto boy'” before and was “shocked and saddened” by the article.

“He said Ms Dent Coad’s “use of language should not be acceptable for an elected politician… and she should be ashamed”.”

… Except of course it wasn’t Ms Dent Coad’s use of language that was under scrutiny – ever example they mentioned is of her quoting somebody else.

In her article, to which the BBC piece seems to link, but actually links back to itself – curious, that, she quotes Mr Bailey himself as saying he was  “spoilt rotten” and “gobby and dangerous” during a radio interview.

He is the one who describes himself as living in a “ghetto”. Is he going to apologise for any offence caused to residents?

Mr Bailey’s claim that he had never been labelled a “token ghetto boy” is odd, as the article is seven years old – and Ms Dent Coad was quoting people she described as “his former neighbours” – they weren’t her words.

It is therefore a sign of huge magnanimity that she has offered an apology “If [Mr Bailey] is offended – especially considering that this man has jumped onto the “racism” bandwagon that Guido Fawkes launched.

According to the Independent, Mr Bailey said he was “shocked and saddened by the hate-filled, racist article” and called on Ms Dent Coad to apologise for her comments to the wider black community. Why should she? None of her comments were racist – in fact, she was calling out Mr Bailey for his cynical manipulation of racial stereotypes to serve a political purpose. In doing so, she did not actually stoop to racism herself. Read her article and see.

The Evening Standard wrongly stated: “Emma Dent Coad labelled Shaun Bailey a “token ghetto boy” in the 2010 blog post which was highlighted yesterday by political website Guido Fawkes.” Obviously she did not – she was quoting his neighbours. Perhaps the Stannit would like to track down the person responsible for this seven-year-old comment and extract an apology from them? No? Is that because the person she was quoting is “Afro-Caribbean” and that would ruin the narrative?

You had to go to iNews for that particular snippet of information, making it a more balanced read than the others, at least. But that’s not saying much.

According to Zelo Street blogger Tim Fenton, the Guido article was written by someone called Alex Wickham, who – it seems – has a track record of dishonesty. If he was working for a reputable news organisation, it is an offence for which he should be drummed out.

And what is the real reason behind this attack on an upstanding member of the Kensington and Chelsea community, whose constituents should be proud to have her representing them?

Could it be that she has launched a report on the appalling inequalities in the London borough?

On her Twitter feed, she wrote: “The inside story of the most unequal borough in Britain: overcrowding, malnutrition and 20-year life expectancy gaps. Today I launched crucial report on housing and inequality in Kensington & Chelsea after Grenfell.”

You can read the report here. This Writer urges you to take the time to do so.

It might clarify why the BBC, the Standard, the Independent and even iNews have all tried to dirty the name of a fine member of Parliament.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:



  1. NMac November 14, 2017 at 12:40 pm - Reply

    Anything to distract from the mess and chaos of the nasty Tory Party and the incompetent government.

  2. Paul Rutherford November 14, 2017 at 2:32 pm - Reply

    I believe this was discussed today on the Jeremy Vine Show on BBC Radio 2. Unfortunately, I didn’t get to listen, so don’t know what was said. Perhaps others will know…?

  3. FrankFisher November 14, 2017 at 3:15 pm - Reply

    That’s pretty pathetic. It’s a trumped up charge because she *claims* she’s just repeating the abuse from others? Do you remember the grief Enoch Powell got for repeating what his Wolverhampton constituents had said to him?

    Labour built this edifice of political correctness that pillories people for things they said decades ago, so now labour is reaping the whirlwind. Tough.

    • Mike Sivier December 11, 2017 at 1:48 pm - Reply

      Her ‘claim’ is accurate. She repeated what others said to her. They have corroborated what she said.
      Your attempt to bolster the attack against an innocent woman is not only pathetic; it is immoral.

  4. David Evans November 17, 2017 at 8:11 pm - Reply

    Poor, very poor. She used language that was utterly unacceptable by any normal person and got caught out.

    • Mike Sivier November 19, 2017 at 2:11 am - Reply

      No, she quoted language used by people in the constituency – and by the Tory who was the subject of her article.
      Please do a little research into the subject matter – all the links were in my article – before trying to claim the high ground.

Leave A Comment