Watson’s ultimatum is a slap in the face for Labour Party democracy

Undemocratic ultimatum: Tom Watson.

Tom Watson has issued an ultimatum to Jeremy Corbyn about the overdramatised claims of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.

Rather than allow the party to follow its procedures regarding disciplinary action against Margaret Hodge and Ian Austin, he has demanded that their cases should be dropped – for no very good reason.

And he has insisted that the party should adopt fully the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s examples of anti-Semitism (the party has adopted the working definition itself).

This would make it easier for malcontents to make false claims that party members were anti-Semites, of course – Labour’s code of conduct had closed loopholes that would make it possible to stifle legitimate debate about the political actions of the Israeli government with such accusations.

If Mr Corbyn refuses to comply with these unreasonable demands, Mr Watson has warned that the Labour leader risks the party being plunged into “a vortex of eternal shame and embarrassment”.

Because Mr Watson will make sure of it?

It looks very much like blackmail to This Writer – a threat, following on from, and contributing to what appears to be a co-ordinated series of anti-Semitism-themed attacks on the Labour leadership over the last few days.

To what end?

Well, party members are voting in the current NEC elections, so it seems entirely reasonable to suggest that the dire publicity being generated for the party by each allegation published in The Guardian and elsewhere is intended to put people off the Corbyn-supporting ‘left slate’.

The trouble is, the accusations don’t add up to much.

I published a common-sense interpretation of the allegations up to yesterday (August 3) in a previous article.

Today’s instalments in the hate-Corbyn campaign include a claim that the Labour leader was a ‘convenor’ (whatever that is) in the Just World Trust when that organisation, a critic of Israel, wrote a letter in support of Roger Garaudy, a philosopher who was later convicted in France of Holocaust denial.

The Graun‘s article suggests that this person had denied that the killing of six million Jews by the Nazis constituted genocide.

But Wikipedia‘s entry (I know – how shocking that I would have to resort to that unreliable source again!) states that he had written about “the myth of the six million” Jewish victims of the Holocaust.

Those things are not the same. The Wikipedia article clarifies that Garaudy argued that his book dealt with the Israeli government’s use of “the holocaust” as a “justifying dogma” for its actions, mainly in Palestine and toward Palestinians.

If that is true, then he was not saying that the Holocaust did not happen; he was saying that it was being mythologised, in the sense of an idealised or exaggerated image of it being created, in order to justify Israeli government policy – a policy that has come under widespread criticism in the wake of recent massacres of Palestinians by Israeli troops.

That would not be denying the Holocaust; it would be accusing the Israeli government of rewriting history for its own purposes.

It would be useful to have more – and accurate – information on this matter. Clearly The Guardian should be treated as an untrustworthy source in the light of the Wikipedia piece. It seems likely its reporting of this matter is fake news.

Whatever the truth about Garaudy, no blame can be placed on Mr Corbyn. He did not write the letter of support, nor did he sign it; it seems likely he was not aware of its existence.

Yet he is being blamed for it. Unfairly?

It seems the origin of this story is the Community Security Trust, which describes itself as a charity set up to protect the Jewish Community – its head of policy is quoted in the Graun piece.

But left-wing Jewish group Jewdas describes the CST as “a right-wing vigilante group”. That may be going a bit far, but it certainly suggests there is dissent about the organisation’s own values.

Also listed by The Guardian as due to the ongoing anti-Semitism accusations is the resignation from Labour of former MP Tom Harris.

But this seems confusing to me. If he is so concerned about anti-Semitism, Mr Harris will know the danger of frivolous comparisons of others with the Nazis or Adolf Hitler – yet he himself compared former SNP leader Alex Salmond with Hitler for no very good reason.

Is he really the best person to resign in criticism of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership on this matter?

This Writer hopes that Mr Corbyn will refuse to accept Mr Watson’s demands. They are anti-democratic, in that Labour’s deputy leader is trying to dictate what the party should do. Labour has an elected National Executive Committee for that – on which Mr Watson himself sits.

But there will be more, as the CST, the Campaign Against Antisemitism, and all the other right-wing fringe groups I’ve listed in the past empty their archives of all the dirt they have tried to collect on left-wing Labour over the last few decades in search of some mud that will stick.

For Labour’s rank-and-file membership, the best thing to do is ignore these wild, daft and apparently baseless recriminations – and vote for the ‘left-slate’ NEC candidates to show that we will not be intimidated.

Source: Tom Watson: Labour faces ‘eternal shame’ over antisemitism | Politics | The Guardian

Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

11 thoughts on “Watson’s ultimatum is a slap in the face for Labour Party democracy

    1. Tom Jeacock

      I for one will not rue the demise of Senor’ Watson his camp has always been hidden under the Bushel: l despair of the intransigense of deniers…

  1. Neil HippieKiller

    This is utter desperation, demanding Hodge and Austin be let off for shouting in peoples faces is absurd. Both have a history of nasty temper tantrums and to let them off would effectively allow members to shout in each others faces.
    If that were the case I’ve got a few words I’d like to shout in Tom’s face..

    This whole drama is obviously contrived but what is all it for? Trying to get leverage to force a right-wing on the NEC again no matter if all 9 leftys are picked despite smears?
    If they’re serious about SDP’ing why would they care? Unless they’re trying to sink Labour before that.
    Maybe there are skeletons hiding just out of reach, soon to be uncovered, and they are very scared?

  2. John Lincoln

    This is another attempt to unseat Corbyn as leader of Labour. Tom Watson was a high profile malcontent in the last – failed – coup and is trying again. THEY are trying again, those miserable Blairite failures who do nothing but try to undermine the Labour Party.

    1. steve hilling

      You may dislike Lansman for his recent folly, but not electing him lets in a right winger which would be worse.

  3. Pat

    I think Corbyn should of removed Tom Watson after his last failed coup… i remember thinking why didn’t Corbyn sack him then…now it’s time to get rid of these dangerous blairites for good

  4. disabledgrandad

    John then you just voted in a possible right winger that simple because it’s all down to votes cast. I had to hold my nose and vote for him but I will again to stop the right from ever dominating the NEC again.

Comments are closed.