How could this care home spend severely disabled man’s cash on women’s clothes, cosmetics and toys he could not use?

Care: this is the most illustrative image I could find that doesn’t show the people involved in the story – but how many severely disabled people are getting the care they need?

This is a serious breach of care. It seems care home staff and a UK city council spent a severely disabled man’s money on things that weren’t for him – and lied to his family about it.

Ian Reeves was a resident at Marston Court Care Home, Leicester, from 2007 until he died in February 2021. His next of kin, sister Sharon McConnell, developed serious concerns about the care he was receiving and how his money was being spent after their mother died in 2018.

She found that his bedroom was bare and he was sitting in a broken wheelchair, so she asked for control of his finances – but was refused.

So she applied to the courts to become a deputy – with the council retaining the role of appointee – and this was granted. Then she requested information on what had been done with his money.

She found that thousands of pounds had gone into and out of his bank account over the years – being spent on women’s and children’s clothes, cosmetics and toys he could not use.

She also found her wheelchair-bound brother’s money had been spent on Zumba classes and chiropody, which she also found strange. The council told her the Zumba classes were specially adapted and he enjoyed taking part.

There was much more (see the source article – link below – for details).  Ms McConnell wanted more information but was frustrated by the response, so she urged the council, the police, the Care Quality Commission and the ombudsman to carry out their own investigations.

The police and the CQC very quickly backed out. The council concluded the home had mismanaged her brother’s finances and that more than £1,500 of his money was ‘unaccounted for’.

It ordered the home to apologise, pay the missing money back and carry out a review of its policies for managing residents’ finances. But the home did not accept the council’s findings and claimed the spending on Zumba classes, clothing and toys all met Ian’s needs.

Both Marsden Court and the council have been found guilty of failing her brother and maladministration by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

The ombudsman concluded both the council and home mismanaged Ian’s finances. Its report, which refers to Ian only as ‘Mr C’, highlights a catalogue of mistakes by both organisations.

Ms McConnell has been offered apologies and £500 in compensation – to make up for the loss of thousands of pounds.

But bosses at the home, while acknowledging they had to learn lessons on good practice from the case, have said they don’t recognise other concerns that had been raised.

They said the home had received a clean bill of health from the Care Quality Commission (which had backed away from investigating, remember) and the council (which had admitted failings) and other professionals regularly visited the home and viewed Ian’s room.

That’s where this story ends. But it raises questions about the care of other severely disabled people at homes around the UK – the most obvious being the following:

How many other people have received – or are receiving – the same or similar treatment to that received by Ian Reeves?

Source: Scandal as care home spends severely disabled man’s money on women’s clothes, cosmetics and toys he could not use – Leicestershire Live

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


3 thoughts on “How could this care home spend severely disabled man’s cash on women’s clothes, cosmetics and toys he could not use?

  1. flttymartyn

    This truly is disgusting….Those involved should be arrested, convicted and thrown in prison for a very long time as a warning to others!

  2. Hecuba

    “He brought in a lot of money, so yes I’m very sure they’re sorry to have lost him because they’ve lost a huge amount of money each month they could freely dip into. I’m still furious about it.” Yes indeed this ‘non human’ (sic) in the view of that fake care home was enabling them to steal all his money and spend it as they wished!

    This care home and the council are criminals but as usual they won’t be prosecuted or punished! Thousands of pounds stolen from this disabled man and all the care home says is ‘sorry!’ Who was given all those women’s clothes purchased with this disabled man’s money? That is serial theft and I have no doubt many other disabled women and men in care homes are having their money stolen because being disabled means one is worthless!

  3. clove888

    My son was pushed into trying care. At first they tried independent living, then fast realised his limitations were not down to me and my parenting and placed him into a fully supervised care facility, He hated it. He was abused and bruised, then moved to another miles away from home. There he experienced even more abuse including financial abuse as out of his disability allowance and benefits they allowed him just £30 a week. I ended up paying for a mental capacity assessment as money was being spent and nobody could say where. He was given a blow up doll and exposed to all kinds of adult things he could not understand due to his developmental delays. The report finally came and it placed him as a child of less than 7 years and they had been letting him drink whisky and watch porn. I was at this point able to take him out unsupervised and I took him home then challenged them. They tried to force him to go back saying he may be a danger to his younger brothers but although hes a big man he really is a sweet gentle giant. He wanted to live at home. Medway council still manage his money to cover up the missing funds and not do a thing about it, but at least he is safe. A lot of money went missing.

Comments are closed.