This is all part of what This Writer reckons we should be calling ‘NHXit’.
The Conservatives have already cut real-terms funding to the English NHS.
Now they are ensuring that the service won’t work with secret plans to cut delivery in important areas.
The plans have to be secret because otherwise people will know that their publicly-funded health service is being deliberately sabotaged by their government – right?
That would not suit the Tories because they want to whip up a storm of protest at the failings of the publicly-funded service – so they can then hand it over to private hands.
Of course, the Tories didn’t really have a chance with this because the plans were always bound to come into the public domain before they were ready.
What is perhaps more disheartening is the fact that it won’t make a difference to many people – they will simply sit back and accept the destruction of the health service as they know it.
One wonders what it will take to motivate them – Jeremy Hunt driving a stake through an elderly relative’s heart while screaming, “Leaner, fitter, stronger,” perhaps?
NHS chiefs are trying to keep plans to cut hospital services in England secret, an investigation has found.
Full details of 44 reviews of services around the country – which involve closing some A&Es or, in one case, a whole hospital – are yet to emerge.
That is because NHS England told local managers to keep the plans “out of the public domain” and avoid requests for information, the King’s Fund suggested.
Managers were even told how to reject freedom of information requests.
The King’s Fund report did not include any details of cuts, but from the leaks and plans that have been published so far a partial picture is emerging of what is involved.
- Plans in south west London to close one of five hospitals – St George’s, Kingston, Croydon, St Helier or Epsom
- The North Tees proposal to centralise specialist services, including A&E, on two sites. It would lead to services being downgraded at one of the three major hospitals in the area
- In Devon bosses are looking at whether to close some A&E, maternity and stroke services at hospitals across the county so they can be centralised at bigger sites
- In Merseyside there has been talk of merging four hospitals – the Royal Liverpool, Broadgreen, Aintree and Liverpool Women’s – to plug a £1bn shortfall, according to leaked documents
- Plans in Birmingham and Solihull involve reorganising maternity services with fears this could result in fewer units
- Bosses at North Central London have talked about a consolidation of services on fewer sites, leading to fears that the Whittington Hospital could lose its A&E
During its research, the King’s Fund carried out interviews with staff involved in four of the reviews, known as sustainability and transformation plans (STPs). These were done on an anonymised basis.
The local managers said they had been told to keep the process “private and confidential”, which one described as “ludicrous”, while another said the leadership had made the “wrong judgement call” in its approach to managing the process.
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: