Cameron’s cynical use of his late son is enough to turn anyone’s stomach


A commenter on the Facebook group provoked right-wing wrath after David Cameron’s speech yesterday by posting a photograph of a tearful-looking Samantha Cameron and suggesting that even she was embarrassed that he was using the memory of his late son Ivan – yet again – to support his ever-more-desperate claim to be a supporter of the National Health Service.

In the name of balance, Yr Obdt Srvt responded as follows: “Cameron has again and again put the treatment of his child front and centre during discussion of the NHS – a service that he and his government are now determined to undermine and destroy. He was happy to take Disability Living Allowance for his son, but have you noticed that after Ivan passed away, he was also happy to take DLA away from everyone else and replace it with something that is much harder to get?

“Cameron takes selfishness to new levels and, in my opinion, it would be entirely justifiable if his wife was embarrassed to the core by what he said.”

That quietened the dissenting voice, but not the irritation caused to Yr Obdt Srvt by Cameron’s behaviour, which seems offensive to his own child’s memory. It was, therefore, unsurprising to find that he has ‘form’ in this regard, dating back to before Ivan passed away.

Take a look at the following, from Sturdyblog‘s article We need to talk about Ivan. The article featured a series of pictures of Cameron with his son, including the shot at the top of this article, which the author said made him increasingly uneasy:

“Everything had the feel of a ‘photo opportunity’ – not a family portrait.

“I tried to be open to friends who asked ‘would you rather they hid the child away in shame?’. But there was something interesting about both the timing and tone of this – pitched like a curiosity tent in the middle of an election circus. What about the other side in that election?

“I am no fan of Gordon Brown, but credit ought to go where it is due. The man is partly blind, he and his wife lost a child only days after she was born, then had another diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. There was no denial; no attempt to hide away the facts; no shame. But there was also no feeding the media in order to boost likeability – and, heaven knows, Brown needed it. There was stoicism. There was dignity.

“I tried to dismiss my extreme discomfort with the way Ivan was being used, at least in my subjective judgement. I tried to convince myself that this was my own cynicism talking; my political dislike of conservatism; my shameful, selfish awkwardness and guilt at being confronted with disability.

“Unfortunately the pattern continued, even after his death. There were photographs from the funeral, which did not appear ‘papped’. There were pictures at assorted memorials, taken by the Camerons’ official photographer, engineered to engender sympathy or even pity. There were visits to hospices sponsored by OK! Magazine.”

Writing in March 2012, the author stated: “Last week David Cameron referred to baby Ivan during Prime Minister’s Questions again. It was the sixth or seventh time he has done so, either obliquely or directly, in response to difficult questions about the NHS or welfare or disability benefits. Occasionally Cameron is baited into it. He must rise above such occasions. Occasionally, however, the mention is defensive and entirely unprompted.”

Here’s the moment, caught on YouTube:

“In last week’s PMQs Cameron was asked by Dame Joan Ruddock about cutting the benefits to one of her constituents – a 10-year-old girl with cerebral palsy. In his response he denied that the benefits available to disabled children were being cut (a distinct untruth with regard to new claimants as explained in this factcheck) and continued: “As someone who has actually filled out the form for disability allowance and had a child with cerebral palsy, I know how long it takes to fill in that form.”

“No reference to the girl about whom the question was; no offer to look into her case; no attempt to answer the question. Only an out-of-context reference to Cameron’s dead child, offered as irrefutable proof that his reforms must be right and implied rebuke for daring to question them.

“We always complain that our politicians are out of touch. What is the objection about a Prime Minister using his personal experience to help shape policy? No objection. But policy consists of words put into action. When the action is distinctly contrary to the words, it is not policy. It is hypocrisy.

“He has presided over an unprecedented, concerted campaign against the NHS. So much so, that the very unit in which his child died is threatened with closure. To do this while citing his personal experiences to silence his critics, is unspeakably wicked.

“To stand there, at the dispatch box, and invoke his plight as the parent of a disabled child, then minutes later announce the closure of 36 Remploy factories (not via a statement by the relevant minister, but by placing a letter in the library) is utterly cowardly.

“The net result? A conversation about Ivan in which nobody dares speak up for Ivan. A muted debate, in which the interests of children like him are not fully represented in our Parliament.

“Each time the spectre of that poor child is raised like an invincible shield by his own father, each time his memory is drop-kicked into a political minefield – knowing that nobody will dare touch it – debate is silenced and legitimate questions about these reforms go unanswered. It is not only inappropriate. It is distasteful and immoral.”

It was then and it is now.

To put Cameron’s claims about the NHS in perspective, Michael Portillo has been quoted (many times) as saying: “They didn’t believe they could win the election if they told you what they were going to do.” Here’s the moment, from Andrew Neil’s This Week show:

Oliver Letwin has also been – famously – quoted as saying that within five years of a Conservative election victory “the NHS will not exist anymore”.

Andrew Lansley spent six or seven years working on what became the Health and Social Care Act 2012, apparently to make it as convoluted as possible in order to prevent its blueprint for an NHS poisoned by profit-making concerns from being diluted during Parliamentary debate. He was banned from talking about this work in the run-up to the 2010 general election (see Never Again?: The story of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 – A study in Coalition government and policy, The King’s Fund and Institute for Government, p2).

The Conservative-led Coalition came into office promising year-on-year increases in funding for the NHS – and has reneged on that promise every year for which funding outturns are known.

The above are just representative examples of the evidence available to show Cameron’s contempt for the service that treated his son.

Coming right up to date, Political Scrapbook called Cameron’s bluff by referring to disabled children he didn’t mention in his conference speech yesterday. The article quoted him verbatim: “For me, this is personal. I’m someone who’s relied on the NHS and … who knows what it’s like when you go to hospital night after night with a sick child in your arms. How dare they say that I would ever put that at risk for other people’s children?”

Then it continued: “In the interests of balance, here are some other disabled children from around the country — a nation in which 40% of children with disabilities live in poverty — who didn’t merit inclusion in his keynote address.

“Five year old Reuben Sims requires round-the-clock care and breathes using a ventilator. His mother has been charged £18.40 per week for the ‘spare bedroom’ used to store Reuben’s medical supplies.

Reuben Sims, disabled child hit by Bedroom Tax

“Here is Luis Rennie, who suffers from cerebral palsy and is registered blind. He has faces eviction from his family home — specially adapted at a cost of £60,000 — if his mother refuses to pay for the room used to store equipment such as wheelchairs.

Luis Rennie, disabled child and a victim of the Bedroom Tax

“And it’s not just the Bedroom Tax which is putting the squeeze on families with disabled children.

“A flavour of the impact of austerity on services provided directly by local authorities is given in an analysis of London boroughs by Ambitious About Autism:

  • Cuts to transport services for children with special education needs
  • Cuts to children with disabilities teams
  • Charging for non-statutory services
  • Provision of statutory services at a reduced level

“Charities working with deaf and blind children are reporting cuts in specialist services.

“Then there’s Universal Credit, which — if Iain Duncan Smith’s team develop the competency to actually implement the policy — will leave 100,000 disabled children worse off by more than £120 per month.

“Young people’s charities also face public funding cuts of almost £405 million over the five years to 2015/16 — a greater proportion than the rest of the voluntary sector.

“Respite for carers is being slashed, with eight out 10 family carers telling Mencap that ‘they have reached breaking point due to a lack of short breaks’:

“‘When you care for someone 24 hours per day and you know it’s going to be forever, sometimes a short break is your only hope.'”

Yr Obdt Srvt has personal experience as a carer and knows this statement to be true.

The sad fact is that the likes of David Cameron will never accept that using a dead relative as a commodity, as a trump card in an argument, is morally wrong. They do not understand the swell of indignation they create whenever they put their grief (whether real or feigned) on parade in a bid to gain electoral sympathy – and voters’ support. They believe they are right to do so.

They deserve to be stripped of that misapprehension in the most humiliating way. When it happens, let’s hope it hits Cameron as hard as the slap in the face he so richly deserves – from his own spouse.

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for those who cannot stand up for themselves!

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:



  1. Bob Passmore October 2, 2014 at 12:54 pm - Reply

    he’s a disgrace!!

  2. Samuel Miller (@Hephaestus7) October 2, 2014 at 2:06 pm - Reply

    Some pundits have suggested that Britain’s sick and disabled are being punished for Ivan’s death.

  3. Nick October 2, 2014 at 2:38 pm - Reply

    as i sated in one of your previous blogs today mike David Cameron was never much at home with his son he did not like any normal father spend that amount of time with him he like most conservatives mp’s he would have only looked out for himself sad but true

    Ivan’s death was very tragic has he lived the sick and disabled today may not have persecuted like they have resulting in their many deaths as we have all to often seen over the past few years

    however Ivan did die and as a result David Cameron has decided to remove any sort of help for the sick and disabled hence your pitures above

    David Cameron has said many times on TV that parents must fight for their children if in need as there are many cutbacks and errors on the levels of care handed out will be subject to negligence

    what that means is that i am not responsible for the works of the DWP so you will need to fight via your mp for your welfare rights and benefits for any redress

    for those parents that are unable to fight for whatever reason will obversely have to pay the price which means loss of benefits or nursing help etc or both

    David Cameron son was a reminder to us all and that’s when your sick or disabled or both you need a high level of care irrespective of what the patient feels they need as death can strike at any time like in this case be if from a fall or choking or many other types of accidents that can and do happen regularly to those unwell

  4. hstorm October 2, 2014 at 2:41 pm - Reply

    David Cameron – Really Putting The N In ‘Cut’.

  5. Dave Notcammo October 2, 2014 at 4:50 pm - Reply

    Cameron was sacked as the honourary chairman of one of the charities he took full advantage of while his poor son was alive, because when he got into power he immediately cut the grants to it and many other charities, You shall know them by their actions…

    • John Blackburn October 3, 2014 at 5:03 pm - Reply

      He also put his son as a reason why,the NHS is so special to him.Then he cuts billions from there budget,hes so desperate for power,he,ll sell his soul,he wants a good kicking.

      • Mike Sivier October 3, 2014 at 5:50 pm - Reply

        Not according to the BBC! Auntie wants us all to think he has spent more on the NHS, year on year. It’s complete tosh – in real terms he hasn’t done anything of the sort, but the BBC doesn’t make the distinction.
        (I’m in a heated behind-the-scenes argument with BBC News about it at the moment. You could never tell, could you?)

  6. Jim Drummond October 2, 2014 at 5:18 pm - Reply

    Was speaking to a lovely young lady today about Cameron, his bereavement and what he has done to demolish Widows Parents Allowance. His henchman Lord Freud asked interested parties to attend a “consultation” meeting which he still claims to have “consulted” interested parties. A huge LIE – at the meeting he simply TOLD ALL THE INTERESTED PARTIES what Cameron was GOING TO DO. Instead of a £6/8K a year “while your children are in full time education” which was drawn from the full NI stamp of your partner Cameron has replaced it with a one off £8k. After that probably last for 6 months you will need to go out to work to pay the costs of childminders. 80/90 % of the bereaved under the age of 50 are widows with young children. Cameron has effectively condemned them into poverty and is stealing their partners NI contributions. THE most callous act ever committed. He seem to believe that you are fit to work after a few months when in fact you are likely to be incapable of much for about 3 years – I know my wife died age 46.

  7. Martin Gaughan October 3, 2014 at 12:17 am - Reply

    I hope he dies from a long painful agonizing illness, and suffers the pain that he is putting unfortunate normal people through. It’s hard to imagine anyone that evil still being allowed to hold a position of power in any country on this planet. We are supposed to be a civilized nation. Someone please explain to me how this lunatic is not in an asylum.

    • Stephen Bee October 4, 2014 at 3:08 am - Reply

      The sad part is he is NOT supposed to be ‘in power’…he is there to serve…but reading this story and the other side issues..makes me feel ‘physically sick’ I wish one decent TV interviewer would challenge him publically on his hypocrisy on sooo many things…and show him up for the total ‘twat’ he is…A groundswell of people who are awake and not standing for service as MP’s..should really be instigated to go out into the community in every electoral ward..and just go to the streets and tell the truth…tho that would take backbone…’sigh’

  8. Mitch October 3, 2014 at 10:41 pm - Reply

    That man, and I use the term loosely, is a disgrace. I am ashamed to be british and I use the small b as it does not deserve a large one any more. The “people” of these isles have sunk to a new low and care not for their fellow man. Hang your heads in shame.

  9. Lizzie Davies October 5, 2014 at 2:22 am - Reply

    …..err…why exactly was someone in his financial position finding it necessary to claim the pittance of benefits. That alone tells me a great deal about this ‘human’.

  10. Carole Frost October 8, 2014 at 11:13 pm - Reply

    as far as i am concerned my being disabled from 58years old ..david cameron does not have much empathy for disabled people young or old but he IS punishing all of us disabled and sick because of his son mother was with me 24.7 when i was little i went to hospitals 7days a week..from being a handicapped baby till i was 21years old parents were devoted people.. they understood disability even my brothers and sisters .

Leave A Comment