The DUP will not have to name the source of a £425,000 donation it spent campaigning for Brexit | The Independent

Partners in secrecy: Theresa May (left) with Arlene Foster, the leader of the DUP [Image: Carl Court/Getty Images].

This makes a mockery of referendum campaign transparency.

What is the origin of this money?

If it is all above-board, why has the donor not come forward voluntarily?

And, if it is legitimate, why has James Brokenshire of the Tory government done everything in his power to keep the facts hidden?

An obscure parliamentary committee has voted to continue to keep secret the source of a £425,000 donation to the Democratic Unionist Party, that was spent on wrap-around pro-Brexit advertising in the Metro newspaper during the EU referendum.

It means that changes to the rules for the publication of donors to Northern Irish political parties will only apply to donations made after the 1st July 2017, and will not be backdated to 2014 in accordance with previously agreed legislation.

It also means that the source of the £425,000 donation, the largest to any Northern Irish political party in history, and which has largely been seen as a device through which to donate anonymously to the Brexit campaign, will not be revealed.

The donation has been named as coming from a group of businessmen called the Constitutional Research Council (CRC), though the ultimate source of their cash has not been confirmed.

£282,000 was spent on a wrap around advertisements on the Metro newspaper, saying “Vote Leave. Take Back Control” under Democratic Unionist Party branding. Some of the money was also paid to a data company linked to the analytics firm who worked for the Brexit campaign, Cambridge Analytica.

Source: The DUP will not have to name the source of a £425,000 donation it spent campaigning for Brexit | The Independent

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:



  1. NMac December 21, 2017 at 2:13 pm - Reply

    Cover up the blatant corruption – the Establishment looks after its own yet again.

  2. tristramhicks December 21, 2017 at 3:02 pm - Reply

    If the money was spent on the Mail-owned Metro advertising, presumably it’s in the group accounts. Particularly easy if it was the Mail that donated the money. I have no inside track on this, just idle speculation.

  3. Barry Davies December 21, 2017 at 8:34 pm - Reply

    Still waiting for remain to face charges over using government money, on top of that allowed, to send out the propaganda leaflet true facts(lies) the entire nation.

    • Mike Sivier December 22, 2017 at 3:59 pm - Reply

      I didn’t agree with government money being used for that purpose, but I’m interested to know what parts of it you consider to be lies and where your evidence is.
      You have a pitiful record in this regard – absolutely no proof provided so far.

  4. Thomas December 22, 2017 at 12:41 am - Reply

    If naming the person would make paramilitaries come after he or she, not naming them is best, but if not it’s just harbouring corruption.

Leave A Comment