The Establishment went to extraordinary lengths to protect this child sex abuser

Hubert Chesshyre: Not Of the Normal Criminal Element.

It seems remarkably reserved of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse to suggest that heraldry expert Hubert Chesshyre was given “preferential treatment” after he was found to have committed two specimen counts of indecent assault against a child.

The perpetrator had been made a Commander of the Royal Victorian Order (CVO) in 2014 but by the time he was accused, the following year, he was found to be suffering from dementia and unfit to plead. How convenient.

A trial of the facts led to a unanimous verdict that he had committed two specimen counts of indecent assault against a child, with a third ordered to lie on file. But because he had been found unfit to plead, he was awarded an absolute discharge. How convenient.

Later that year, the victim approached the honours and appointments secretariat at the Cabinet Office, requesting that Chesshyre’s honour should be rescinded. He was told to contact Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse (as the honour is the gift of the Sovereign).

Reid received help in drafting his response from Thomas Woodcock, Garter Principal King of Arms, the senior officer of the College of Arms, of which Chesshyre was a member for 40 years  – and said that, as Chesshyre was given an absolute discharge, “it would be wrong to submit a recommendation to the Queen”. How convenient.

After an intervention from the victim’s MP, Jim Dowd, the forfeiture committee recommended the Queen remove the honour. But the victim did not learn of this until five months after the decision because the forfeiture committee was considering “representations and new information provided to it by Chesshyre’s brother on his behalf”. How convenient.

The committee took the almost unprecedented decision not to publish the forfeiture in official journal of record the London Gazette, in “reflection of how the case had been handled and, to a lesser degree, in light of Mr Chesshyre’s ill-health”. How convenient.

The failure to publish confirmation of the forfeiture had made it difficult for the victim to bring Chesshyre’s abuse to the attention of prestigious organisations of which he continued to be a member, so they saw no reason to end their association with him. How convenient.

Buckingham Palace has said it does not comment on individuals, but that it has reviewed its processes and changes have been made to reflect lessons learned. We are not informed of the nature of those changes. How convenient.

And a government spokesman has said the forfeiture process is confidential and it would be inappropriate to comment on individual cases. How convenient.

So it seems a convicted child abuser got off free as a bird because the government and Buckingham Palace conspired to hide his guilt.

And all the inquiry could say was that Chesshyre had received “preferential or exceptional treatment … because of their status and contacts, regardless of the known involvement of child victims”.

Is that good enough?

I think the victim deserves a grovelling apology, at the very least, from the bureaucrats who hid the facts of his abuse from the public and other organisations. Don’t you agree?

Source: Child sex abuser given ‘preferential treatment’, says damning report | Child protection | The Guardian

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


3 thoughts on “The Establishment went to extraordinary lengths to protect this child sex abuser

  1. Dez

    Totally appalling situation. I guess when one has been showered with the
    Establishments trinkets it does not look to good that their accolades are blemished by their recipients alleged tacky past time habits. Bit like the knighting of Saville for services rendered coming spectacularly undone when his dark side was finally revealed. Still it is good to see that the great ‘n good still do not struggle when it comes to an easy decision on one of their own…….ie not guilty, kick can down the road, nothing to see here, move on.

  2. Jeffrey Davies

    Lessons learned where have we herd that before dwp hmm they all in it but we are the stock to be abused the they did the more they were used by the the government when they wanted their help

Comments are closed.