Scientists have warned that Boris Johnson’s plan to end lockdown restrictions will cause a huge increase in Covid-19 hospitalisations – even in the most optimistic scenarios.
So much for “following the science”, eh?
It seems that
The government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) [said] tens of thousands more people can be expected to die from Covid because vaccines will not provide complete protection against the disease, and not everyone will have the jabs.
All scenarios led to a resurgence of cases because so many vulnerable people remained unprotected, even with high vaccine coverage.
Johnson’s plan is a bespoke model that does not correspond with any of the SAGE scenarios – but its closest equivalent, scenario three, predicts a resurgence of Covid-19 in the UK around September.
At yesterday’s press briefing on the government’s plans, chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, who is said to have shares in a pharmaceutical company that was working on a vaccine, warned that even with 80 per cent efficacy, half the population would still be at risk from the disease.
He said a cautious step-by-step process, with pauses of four or five weeks between each to monitor the impact, was the right way to go.
It seems strange, then, that the Johnson plan will reopen all English schools on March 8.
Scientific modellers predict that this will drive the infection rate up by between 10 and 50 per cent – negating the reductions of the current lockdown and vaccinations.
They said a limited reopening, possibly starting with primary schools, was a far better option and would allow scientists to assess the impact on infections within the community.
Johnson has ignored this good advice and intends to steamroll his easements through – as he did last year.
We all know how that turned out. Why are you letting him do it to you again?
Source: Demand from Tory MPs to scrap Covid rules ‘could bring huge death toll’ | Politics | The Guardian
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
I’m no supporter of Boris Johnson, but we can’t leave the economy locked forever either.
True. So you agree that he should have locked down earlier – and properly – as happened in many other countries that are now recovering well?
Johnson is indeed the problem here. He’s the one who has damaged the UK economy.
As reported today in the mainstream press, the UK is among the tightest and publicly compliant countries in the world. Moreover, many non-lock down countries have a lower per capita Covid death rate than ours. The truth is, there is no evidence of a correlation between lock downs and reductions in Covid mortality. It’s counter-intuitive to believe otherwise which explains your cognitive dissonance.
What does having a tight lockdown or compliant public have to do with anything that the article mentions?
The lockdown has been working, despite the fact that it isn’t as strict as it should have been – and it really isn’t, no matter what you may think, for reasons that have been discussed ad nauseum such as Tory policy on air travel. That suggests that compliance with it has helped cut down contagion.
All the scientific evidence suggests that lifting the lockdown – especially in the damn silly way Johnson is planning – will increase the contagion again.
How about you provide some evidence – factual evidence, please – to the contrary? No whataboutery, please!