Israel's 'revenge' attack on Iran was in name only - right?

Has the BBC forgotten the dangers of biased reporting?

Gary O’Donoghue seems to have gone native. As a result, we should ask: has the BBC forgotten the dangers of biased reporting?

In his piece on the BBC News website, he refers to “Iran’s brazen attack directly targeting Israel on Saturday”.

The definition of “brazen” is “bold and without shame” – but why should Iran be ashamed of retaliating after Israel aimed an airstrike at the Iranian consulate in Damascus, Syria, levelling it and killing 13 people? UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has admitted that this country would take “very strong action” if one of our own consulates in a foreign country was subjected to a similar terrorist attack by an aggressive third nation.

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

The BBC reporter’s use of the word slants his entire report, making it seem that Iran is in the wrong – when that country was only doing exactly what Cameron said the UK would do, in its place.

Highly successful?

O’Donoghue goes on to suggest that Iran’s airstrike, comprising “more than 300 missiles and drones” was repelled by a “highly successful, hand-in-glove military action by the US and Israel”. Again, has the BBC forgotten the dangers of biased reporting? A few missiles did get through Israel’s “Iron Dome” air defences – those targeting the Israeli airbase from which the attack on Iran’s Damascus consulate is believed to have been launched.

The others are believed to have been nothing more than a diversion, intended to reveal the locations of Israel’s air defence emplacements.

So Iran’s bombs reached their primary target, and also achieved a secondary target of providing detailed intelligence to Israel’s enemies. And the defence against them was “highly successful”? Hmm.

Contradictory lobbying

At least O’Donoghue is right about one thing: US President Joe Biden, like Cameron, must now urge Israel not to do anything that escalates this Middle East regional conflict further.

This, it seems, requires contradictory lobbying: “The president has to simultaneously lower the temperature with Iran, but at the same time, make Tehran understand there is a cost to its actions.”

It’s a forlorn hope. Why should Iran step down, when it was only avenging its sovereign territory that had been attacked, and defending its other territories from further attack? We have all been told ad nauseum that Israel has a right to defend itself; doesn’t Iran have the same right?

So, yet again, has the BBC forgotten the dangers of biased reporting? If Tehran has to “understand there is a cost to its actions”, why has nothing been done to make Tel Aviv aware that its actions should carry the same costs?

Is Biden just a doddery old hypocrite, along with other Western government representatives, like Cameron? And is O’Donoghue failing to report that in an impartial, fact-based way?


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Leave A Comment