Do the people of Barnes, Sunderland, really hate themselves so much they elected someone who hates them too?

Antony Mullen: How many of you saw this image and thought, “He doesn’t look like a racist”?

That’s what it seems.

And the voters of Barnes elected Antony Mullen ahead of Zaf Iqbal – a person Mr Mullen falsely linked with the Manchester bombing, according to this tweet:

Note that Mr Mullen’s membership had been suspended by the Conservative Party – but he was reinstated after winning his election.

It seems odd that the Conservative Party said the tweets were made years ago – I’m pretty sure the Manchester bombing happened only last year.

I’d love to say Mr Mullen’s words didn’t fool anyone – but they fooled 1,560 residents of Barnes ward.

But these people have their feet in the real world:

Perhaps a more pertinent question would be: How the hell has the Conservative Party not been ripped to shreds by the media for supporting racism?

But, of course, we all know the answer to that one.

Right?

A newly-elected Conservative councillor who was suspended after posting a series of “offensive” posts on social media has been elected and reinstated.

Antony Mullen, who now represents the Barnes ward of Sunderland, was suspended at a national level following comments labelled as offensive by Labour and Liberal Democrats.

The Twitter posts included describing his city as a “post-apocalyptic ****hole” and the Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott as a “filthy, bulbous pig”.

The teaching assistant won a majority in Thursday’s elections with 1,560 votes – just 322 more votes than his Labour rival Zaf Iqbal.

Mr Mullen claimed his comments had been taken out of context or “wildly construed to give an unfavourable impression” of him.

A Conservative party statement said the tweets had been made between four and seven years ago while he was a student at Durham University and before he became a Tory member.

Source: Candidate Antony Mullen who was suspended for offensive tweets about Sunderland gets elected… in Sunderland


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

3 thoughts on “Do the people of Barnes, Sunderland, really hate themselves so much they elected someone who hates them too?

  1. Thomas Walker

    Barnes in Sunderland are better than the rest of us plebs. God knows what Pallion were doing voting Libdem, it’s no better than Sulgrave.

  2. aunty1960

    The thing with elections you may find the people do not agree with you and agree with your opponent and hold horrendous beliefs

    Elections show people do not care about what you care about and think right and vote accordingly.

    And you have to know the local politics and intricacies of the local populace.

  3. aunty1960

    Just had a woman rant at me and another disabled on our walk out with doggies that it does not matter how many disabled have died and suffered due to cuts its those defrauding the system that is important, telling her less than 1% defraud system was on deaf ears and she did not care of numbers dead.

    DEAF DEAF DEAF. AND TOTALLY SELFISH AND BLIND

Comments are closed.