This is how fear of a Tory split could threaten the course of Brexit

Speculation about the effect particular Brexit options could have on the Conservative Party may hinder the course of democracy.

This Site reported yesterday (March 31) that pro-Brexit ministers are threatening to resign if Mrs May agrees a permanent customs union with the EU – but that is precisely the course most likely to be chosen by the “indicative” votes due to take place in the House of Commons today, if last week’s exercise in democracy is any yardstick.

So how would any conscientious Conservative ensure that their party stays together?

By not supporting the “customs union” option – that’s how. Right?

A customs union is part of the Labour Party’s preferred form of Brexit, so that party might whip its members to support the option whenever they can.

But there are good – in terms of party politics – reasons for the Tories not to support a customs union. According to the Mirror, “following that policy would break the Tories’ 2017 manifesto and stop the UK signing its own trade deals around the world.”

Despite turning their backs on manifesto promises almost as soon as they were made in 2017, the Tories have since become rather precious about them and it seems 170 Conservative MPs, supported by 10 cabinet ministers including Jeremy Hunt, Michael Gove, Sajid Javid and Penny Mordaunt, have written to Mrs May, demanding that she take the UK out of the EU as soon as possible – and not into a customs union.

If that’s true, they’re saying she should honour the Tory manifesto by ignoring the will of Parliament (if a majority of MPs go for the “customs union” option). That would be contempt of Parliament, of course, and Mrs May’s government is already the only sitting government ever to be found guilty of that offence. A second such ruling might trigger the election that Tories are equally desperate to avoid, as it could be said that Mrs May’s administration was not fit to govern.

But another wing of the Tories seems keen for Mrs May to support a customs union – as suggested by David Gauke, The Guardian has reported.

Mrs May might be thinking she can get out of it with her plan to subject us all to a fourth vote on her meaningless Brexit deal, set against anything chosen by Parliament today.

But (again) it is entirely possible that a large contingent of her Parliamentary party could resign before she gets that far – even though any such vote will happen this week.

It’s a dilemma – and one that threatens to break the Conservatives in a big way if they get it wrong. I’m hoping they do.

But I fear that they will make a choice that helps only themselves – and even then, only in the short term.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


No Comments

  1. Stu April 1, 2019 at 2:20 am - Reply

    Remember last week when May made her desperate “resignation” announcement timed just before the votes ?
    Expect another such devious,cynical manoeuvre.

  2. Roy Beiley April 1, 2019 at 6:10 am - Reply

    Seems like Mrs. May is running out of “wriggle room” as the Brexit “noose” tightens around her neck. Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t!

  3. nmac064 April 1, 2019 at 7:28 am - Reply

    For the good of the whole nation it is high time the Tory Party split asunder.

  4. kateuk April 1, 2019 at 10:18 am - Reply

    “following that policy would break the Tories’ 2017 manifesto and stop the UK signing its own trade deals around the world.” If we stay in the Customs union we don’t need to make our own trade deals as we are already part of a huge number of good trade deals through our membership of the EU. What makes the Tories think that we can negotiate better deals on our own than we already have? Trump and chlorinated chicken anyone?

  5. SteveH April 1, 2019 at 11:09 am - Reply

    It is worth reminding ourselves that the 2016 Referendum was advisory and the implications of this

    Over 200,000 (>two hundred thousand) people had petitioned the High Court to void the result because of illegal activity and the Supreme Court ruled on these petitions in December 2016. The Supreme Court judged that the EU referendum was not legally binding but advisory, so logically it cannot be ordered to be rerun by a court. The decision about whether to go back to the public after a advisory referendum is not a legal judgement; it is a political one.

    I appreciate that it sounds ridiculous but it is what it is. If it had been any other type of election or referendum the court would have been able to act (they have in the past) even a Local Authority Referendum would have fallen under the rule of law but not the 2016 EU Referendum.

    We are rather bizarrely committed to enact the result of an advisory referendum that if it had been anything else but advisory would have almost certainly have been voided because of various illegalities. You couldn’t make it up.

Leave A Comment