When the British Medical Journal demands the equivalent of a war crimes trial for British political leaders who have worsened the Covid-19 crisis, it’s time to sit up and pay attention.
In an editorial, the BMJ has accused Boris Johnson and his Conservative government of mass murder because he – and they – not only said they were
willing to allow tens of thousands of premature deaths for the sake of population immunity or in the hope of propping up the economy
but actually went through with it – allowing those deaths to take place.
The piece asks serious questions:
If policy failures lead to recurrent and mistimed lockdowns, who is responsible for the resulting non-covid excess deaths?
When politicians wilfully neglect scientific advice, international and historical experience, and their own alarming statistics and modelling because to act goes against their political strategy or ideology, is that lawful?
How big an omission is not acting immediately after the World Health Organization declared a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020?
The BMJ goes on to suggest that Johnson’s failures and omissions amount to “social murder” – conditions created by the privileged classes leading to premature and “unnatural” death among the poorest.
Today, “social murder” may describe the lack of political attention to social determinants and inequities that exacerbate the pandemic.
Elected ministers – not just in the UK but around the world – have dodged responsibility for the huge numbers of deaths caused by their deliberate decisions to ignore scientific advice and to avoid, delay or mishandle policies that would have saved lives.
They say they have done all they can – Boris Johnson relies on this one very often.
And Johnson also likes to tell us that there was no precedent for Covid-19, meaning he had no way of knowing what to do and when to do it.
He’s lying when he says these things.
Obviously he hasn’t done everything he could, because he ignored scientific advice and delayed vital decisions, causing tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths.
If you have a relative or friend who died because of Covid-19, it is probably because of Boris Johnson.
And he did have guidelines on what to do; they just hadn’t been updated since the Conservatives slithered back into Downing Street in 2010. In fact, they systematically dismantled the UK’s processes for dealing with a pandemic – deliberately ensuring that lives could not be saved.
Sadly, the media have not only allowed this gaslighting to go unchallenged but have often been complicit in it:
Truth has become dispensable as politicians and their allies are allowed to lie, mislead, and repaint history, with barely a hint of a challenge from journalists and broadcasters. Anybody who dares to speak truth to power is unpatriotic, disloyal, or a “hardliner.”
Ministers in the UK, for example, interact with the media through sanitised interviews, stage managed press conferences, off-the-record briefings to favoured correspondents, and, when the going gets tough, by simply refusing to appear.
It is this environment that has allowed covid denial to flourish, for unaccountability to prevail, and for the great lies of “world beating” pandemic responses to be spun.
How many excess deaths does it take for a chief scientific or medical adviser to resign? How long should test and trace fail the public before a minister of health or chief adviser steps down? How many lucrative contracts for unscientific diagnostic tests that are awarded to cronies or errors in education policy will lead to a ministerial sacking?
We know the answer now: it will never happen under the Johnson government. They consider themselves unaccountable and will never willingly accept responsibility for the more than 100,000 deaths we know they have caused.
One reason killers like the Tory government are getting away with it is the complicity of the mainstream media, which treats expert evidence as mere opinion, to be given only the same weight as the self-justifications of Johnson.
Simon Wren-Lewis, in his Mainly Macro blog, accurately states that the media have a heirarchy of opinion-holders, with politicians at the top – even though we know that politicians are either ignorant, or they are liars.
Scientific knowledge isn’t another opinion,
As long as the media treats scientific knowledge as opinion, it removes itself from reality and diminishes its audience.
And there’s no respite, even when the opinions put forward are transparently lies:
Obvious lies should be less of a problem because most journalists will recognise them as lies, and have the potential to call them such [but] so engrained is the notion of balance that often journalists do not even do that.
Time and again over the last decade, expert knowledge has been marginalised as just another opinion, with the opinions (or indeed lies) of politicians ranked higher.
Time and again, expert knowledge has been proved right and the politicians proved to be liars.
Professor Wren-Lewis points to austerity and Brexit as examples within the last decade, making the point that Covid-19 is taking us in the same direction:
Once again the media has decided that politics rather than expertise will drive its coverage. As a result, even after over 120,000 deaths, we have media coverage which sometimes balances the government’s policy against the opposition who want to follow SAGE, or worse the government’s policy against COVID nutters who happen to be Tory MPs. Worse still, the tiny minority of Barrington Declaration academics are given airtime even after they have been proved wrong time and time again.
As a result, the elimination (or zero-COVID) policy that is supported by many medics and is being followed by some countries, and is today being debated among medical experts has hardly been discussed at all in most media outlets.
Elimination is just not practical, it has been decided.
Whether this goes more widely as a BBC policy remains to be seen, but it is not the BBC’s job to decide that a policy recommended by many medics and economists familiar with pandemics, and implemented in many countries, is not practical.
if politicians get involved then knowledge goes out of the window.
No wonder certain politicians lie all the time when most of the media provides no deterrent.
Equally when a politician contradicts knowledge that is not known to journalists there is no deterrent provided by the media.
And people die in their tens of thousands.
And you sit there, spoonfed lies with a sugar-coating of “scientific knowledge is just opinion”, and let it go on.
But we are all part of the system and we can change it if we want. Right?
Or is our democracy just another sham?
Are you going to carry on sitting still while another 100,000 people die and Johnson lies to us that he isn’t responsible, or are you going to get up and have your say?
What will it take to make get up and take action?
Source: Covid-19: Social murder, they wrote—elected, unaccountable, and unrepentant | The BMJ
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Why do you think that they got away with aktion t4 denial of benefits to those who need them two hundred thousand pushed towards early death yet nobody’s doing a thing the doctors and nurses who should have brought it up all those years ago allowed it to happen yet you say how they were told that their actions working for this lot with atos crapita maximus were helping to cull the stock even some like me took them to parliament under the guise of ice whot a lovely name but oh dear DWP have their mitts in this it’s rigged by them our lovely government but doctors nurses were told about it and now we have a virus wonder will the peasants get justice nah they have a law were they all be absolved you can’t make this up sorry to say
We need only look back at the Spanish Flu to see how people are held to account ie they are not. Back then the fact there was a pandemic was hushed up due to the war effort (it doesn’t make sense but there you go) The public went about there business unaware of the risks and millions died when, even then, they could have been avoided. Eventually quarantining and mask laws were introduced but not quickly enough to save the many who had died due to it being kept quiet.
Even now looking back we can’t say directly who was responsible nor even exactly how many died.
As we know from the other, many, incidences of deaths caused by government action/inaction it takes 30 years, 50 years or until the politicians have died before we know what has actually happened. Look at things as diverse as Bloody Sunday (still no justice) Cyril Smith (no justice during his lifetime) and currently we have Grenfell which goes all the way to the top too.
We can’t be under any illusion that we will ever get justice for those who died unnecessarily. Aside from a few countries like New Zealand, Iceland and Korea the leaders were slow to act and willing to throw tens of thousands of their own people under the bus to save some money.
I will ALSO say that there is blame to be apportioned in the medical community. The wide use of ‘do not resuscitate’ without the consent of the patient or families even being used for people with learning disabilities has contributed to deaths among the elderly and disabled where it need not have. This is a cultural problem in the NHS and has been brought up already, they have faced criticism and been warned against doing so again. Yet we see that it is so deeply ingrained that they have ignored this. I see the problem as being at consultant level where they do not feel answerable to anyone, not even patients or their families.