Boris please note: We don’t need violence to demonstrate against Thatcherism

It seems police confiscated an effigy of the Blue Baroness after protesters set fire to it in Glasgow. It is doubtful that the scene looked anything like the above image. Without an effigy to burn the protesters did NOT become violent. They DID do a conga, while chanting, "Maggie Maggie Maggie, dead dead dead".

It seems police confiscated an effigy of the Blue Baroness after protesters set fire to it in Glasgow. It is doubtful that the scene looked anything like the above image. Without an effigy to burn, the protesters did NOT become violent. No – they did a conga, while chanting, “Maggie Maggie Maggie, dead dead dead”.

Why on earth does Boris Johnson think it’s necessary to put the fear of violence into our heads, just because people are coming to London to demonstrate in favour of common sense?

The London Mayor said hundreds of Metropolitan police officers would be “kitted up” and ready to be deployed rapidly, in case of outbreaks of disorder.

The trouble with that, of course, is that he has made everybody involved – protesters and police – paranoid that unpleasantness of some kind will happen, and that it will be the other side that starts it!

How utterly ridiculous. By all means, keep your political tools (the police) ready, Boris, but keep them in the background. Otherwise, you’re the one inciting trouble.

If only he was able to step back and look at the situation dispassionately. Consider what the protests are about:

The main event is a demonstration against the current lionisation of Margaret Thatcher that has already cost the taxpayer nearly £2 million in expenses payments for MPs who were recalled to Parliament during their Easter recess for no good reason, when tributes could have been paid to the Blue Baroness upon MPs’ scheduled return, on Monday. Add to that a further £10 million for a state-funded funeral with military honours that a huge proportion of the population believes is undeserved – especially when the late champion of privatisation had more than enough cash in her estate to pay for as much pomp and ceremony as she could ever have wanted – and anyone can see there is a valid justification for the event.

Attendees will include former miners, and members of mining communities that were devastated by the Thatcher government’s decision to force a confrontation with the unions – the real reason the pits were closed in the mid-1980s. They will be joined by travellers – whose kind were attacked by police, in their role as a political tool of the Thatcher government rather than as guardians of lawful behaviour, most notably in the ‘Battle of the Beanfield’. Students whose grants were transformed into loans during her period of office will also be represented, along with those who are politically opposed to her policies and their legacy.

History tells us that violence involving those groups has always been instigated by those arrayed against them – the forces of the government; remember, the BBC was forced into a (grudging) apology after it was proved that footage of a police charge had been doctored to make it seem the miners had attacked first, when in fact the police provoked the unpleasantness.

So let’s hope that nothing of the kind happens today – either at the main event, the UKUncut demo against the Bedroom Tax and benefit cap, or the Taxpayers Against Poverty march.

But if it does, let’s all take a good hard look at whoever kicks it off – particularly their voting history. I have a sneaking suspicion that anyone causing trouble today will have a prediliction for supporting the Conservative Party.

8 thoughts on “Boris please note: We don’t need violence to demonstrate against Thatcherism

    1. Mike Sivier

      That’s not really the point, Denise. If it kicks off, history suggests it will be police officers doing the kicking! That’s not a good way for law guardians to earn their pay.

  1. Pingback: Boris please note: We don’t need violence to demonstrate against Thatcherism | WorldWright's …

    1. Kim Forbes

      Whatever way you look at it – people will be hurt if one or the other side provokes violence. Please don’t let it be the side of the people who are already being deomonised as “state scroungers”. Don’t give allow for the justification and the satisfaction of saying “violent state scroungers”! It would be very empowering for them to be dishing out criminal records and destoying lives even more for just standing up for rights. Demos have to be peaceful. If the violence starts, it has to be clearly provoked by law enforcement and seen to be so. I personally do not think though that the police in general would want to risk a riot. They themselves are not exactly treated too well after all; remember they were referred to as “plebs”.

  2. beetleypete

    Great post as always. Thatcher will eventually be seen for what she really was. Once the fifty years (or however long it is) have passed, and her papers become available. Pity I’ll be dead, but I will pop off safe in the knowledge that this spiteful woman will be unmasked one of these days. History always wins. Regards, Pete.

Comments are closed.